The stock market may continue to trade in a range this week, with the threat of a US attack on Iran perhaps the biggest temporary risk. The fall-out from the Supreme Court's ruling against Trump's tariffs also will be playing out in the background. It is not likely to move the Fed off its steady policy position in the near term, so would likely be viewed by the market as noise, particularly since Trump's replacement of the old tariffs by a 15% tariff will mitigate any impact. Evidence of a softer labor market, both in terms of jobs and wage inflation, may be more important.
At this point, it appears that Trump will use another law, rather than the national emergency rationale, to justify some form of tariffs. So, the near-term impacts on inflation and the federal budget from the Court's decision may be minor. The trade-off between lower inflation and higher federal deficit may become important for the long end of the Treasury market at some point. Moreover, even if the net change is lower tariffs and tariff refunds, they would represent a tax cut that should help consumer spending and thus growth. So, there would be little need for a boost to the economy from easier Fed policy.
Meanwhile, last week's US economic data did not change the overall picture. Growth is moderate and inflation sticky. Although Q425 Real GDP Growth came in at a below-consensus 1.4% (q/q, saar), it was held down by a temporary drop in federal government purchases stemming from the shutdown. The drop subtracted 1.15 percentage point from the GDP growth rate. This drag, however, is now a propellant for GDP Growth in Q126. The Atlanta Fed model's first estimate of Q126 Real GDP Growth is 3.1%.
The Unemployment Claims data are telling a divergent story. Lower Initial Claims show a decline in layoffs. However, higher Continuing Claims show reluctant hiring by companies. Although one more week of data is needed to complete the evidence from Continuing Claims, they now point to a smaller increase in Nonfarm Payrolls in February than the +130k m/m in January. A small increase could encourage expectations of Fed easing ahead.
The high PCE Deflator in December (0.4% m/m for both Total and Core, with their y/y steady or higher) was not good news for the Fed. It was the second month in a row that these measures of inflation exceeded the corresponding pace in the year-ago month. The inflation outlook is more uncertain now that the tariff situation has changed. The net effect may be to lower inflation in the next few months. This should be viewed as temporary by the Fed and may not be enough to prompt a policy easing. What may be more important is evidence that labor cost inflation is slowing, as already seen in the Q425 Employment Cost Index. Near term, declines in the y/y of Average Hourly Earnings could be key.